Recent Online Media
CalPERS: There is No Arrogance in Following the Law
OPINION: Don’t condemn pension commitments to public workers
Courthouse News Service: Attorney Just Made Things Worse, Client Says
Pension “wave has crested” -- Public employees have done their part
He worked for it
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/openforum/article/California-pension-reform-needs-thought-3739150.php
U-T San Diego: Pension costs squeeze San Diego budget
Public Pension Unfunded Liability: Fact Versus Fiction
Contra Costa Times Letters to the Editor of Note by Police Veteran
Huffington Post: 5 Myths About Public Employee Pensions
National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems (NCPERS) Letter to the Washington Post
California Safety Officers Band Together Against Pension Legislation
Modesto Bee: TIETJEN: False claims overshadow progress in bargaining pension reform
San Diego Business Journal: County Pension Fund Boasts 6.42 Percent Return
Los Angeles County Coalition of Unions Opposes Pension Legislation
Dave Low in Fox & Hounds: Costa's Pension Initiative: Devil is in the Details
Potential Impact of Governor Brown’s Pension Reform Plan on Low Wage Workers
Sacramento Bee: California pension fund earnings outpaced other states in 2011
CRS Member Maricruz Manzanarez in La Opinión: Las pensiones son justas
Senate GOP’s Sudden Interest in Fixing Pensions
Mercury News: State Auditor calls San Jose pension estimates 'unsupported'
Pension 'reformers' distort facts on benefits
Fact Check: Public Employees Already Are Giving at the Office for their Pensions
San Francisco Chronicle: Pension reform not priority with voters, poll says
Pension scare tactics ignore the changes already made
Flawed Report by Marcia Fritz
Fox and Hounds: Pension Reform Needs to Be Done Right, Not Just Right Now
Opinion: It's time to tell the truth about public pensions
The Devil is in the Details
CRS Chairman Dave Low in the Los Angeles Times: Public pension security for California
"Pension Truth Squad" kicks off statewide tour in San Francisco
Why Pension Plans Are Good For Workers
NBC Investigation: San Jose Pension Estimates Questioned
Assemblyman Sandre Swanston in Oakland Tribune: Middle Class Under Attack
The Sky is Not Falling
CRS Ron Cottingham in the North County Times
Californians Need Debate on Retirement Security Based on Facts, Not Scare Tactics
Secret Out-of-State Donor Financing Assault on California's Middle Class
CRS Chairman Dave Low in the Sacramento Bee: Public employees support pension fix
Pension Reform Reality Check
Pot, Meet Kettle
UC Berkeley Study: Half of Californians will Retire in Poverty
Fact Check: Pension Givebacks
KPSP Local: Pension Truth Squad Comes to Valley
In Sacramento, a need for 'reform' school
The Maddy Report Discusses Public Employee Unions
Roger (Niello) & Me
KPSP Local 2: Pension Truth Squad Comes to Valley
Are State Workers Overpaid?
Palm Springs Desert Sun: Statewide effort counters drive to slash budget
Studies: Pension “Crisis” a Myth
Sacramento Bee: Study calculates savings from 'pension reform' proposals
Bloomberg: Enron Billionaire Bankrolls California Advocate for Public Pension Changes
Calaveras Enterprise: CalPERS benefits stimulate economy
Capital Public Radio: Pension Overhaul Efforts Face Big Hurdles
Sacramento Bee: Six factors are working against getting a statewide public pension "reform" initiative on the ballot next year:
Fresno Bee: Public employees/retirees say their pensions are fair
Sacramento Bee Viewpoints: Public pension vitriol is in fashion – and unfair
Sacramento Bee State Worker Blog: Biggest obstacle to pension reform may be pension reformers
Sac Bee State Worker Blog: Union coalition hammers latest pension study
Sac Bee: Unions challenge 'pension-gutting agenda' amid budget talks
Voice of San Diego: The 401(k)'s Sticker Shock
San Francisco Chronicle: Bargaining, not balloting, to fix Oakland pensions
Capitol Weekly Opinion: Time for the pension-reform boogeymen to face the facts
SALINAS CALIFORNIAN SPECIAL REPORT: Average Monterey County pensioners may not warrant the headlines
Sacramento Bee State Worker Blog: Niello abandons pension initiative
Riverside Press-Enterprise: Labor coalition counters what it calls pension myths during Riverside stop
Teachers, Women & Americans Need Pensions
Capitol Weekly Opinion: Corporate, right-wing interests demonizing public workers’ pensions
California Public Fund Says Stocks Led Investment Gain of 18.6%
"Pension Truth Squad" and "DontScapegoatUs.com" Debut in California Pension Reform Fight
Squeezed in the Public Sector
POLITCAL NOTEBOOK: Pension reform group pulls rally switcheroo
California corporations pay far less than nominal tax rate
Have the heroes of 9/11 become today's scapegoats?
The State Worker: With pensions under attack, unions fight back
Combatants in California pension battle trade blows
State worker group speaks out on pension reputation
Labor coalition on pensions to launch website
Pension reform undertaken by Assembly panel
California public employees defend 'modest' pension benefits
Out of Balance?
Public pension fund assets nearly $3 trillion: study
For union families, a loss of value beyond bank accounts
Teacher Pensions Aren’t Budget Busters
Calpers Officer Urges Money Manager Pension-Bashing Donation Disclosure
Cutting public pensions now won't save California.
CalSTRS honored by investor magazine
Elias: No Wisconsin here, but California unions are taking cuts aplenty
State Pension Woes: Not as Bad as They Seem?
Pensiones públicas generan tensiones
Who’s behind the effort to gut California pensions?
New reports says state workers are not overpaid.
Sacramento Bee: Unions call for protest, urge boycott of Niello dealerships
Orange County Registrar: Police and firefighters are making pension sacrifices
Battered Public Pensions Do Better
An Overblown 'Crisis' For State Pension Funds
Most retirees live modestly
Why employee pensions aren't bankrupting states
Who funds the pension Chicken Littles?
Public employees and retirees protest dealership
The Shameful Attack on Public Employees
Myths & Facts
Myth: “Reforming” the pension system will solve the state’s budget crisis.
Fact: No. As a recent column in the Los Angeles Times noted: “Let’s be clear: State employee pensions are not to blame for Sacramento’s budget deficit. Not by any math.” An investigative report by in March byMcClatchy Newspapers noted: “There's simply no evidence that state pensions are the current burden to public finances that their critics claim.”
Myth: Government workers don’t contribute to their pensions; taxpayers are on the hook to pay those costs.
Fact: All government workers contribute to their CalPERS pensions. For state employees, the range is five to eight percent of their monthly earnings; for public agencies it is five to nine percent. While the vast majority pay five percent, firefighters, peace officers, and the CHP pay eight percent.
Myth: CalPERS is unsustainable.
Fact: As a percentage of payroll, employer contribution rates are returning to the levels of the 1980s. In fiscal years 1979-80, 1980-81, 1981-82, for example, pensions as a percent of payroll for miscellaneous State workers were 19 percent of payroll. View details of State Miscellaneous Tier 1 Rates.
Myth: CalPERS is going to run out of money because of baby boomers retiring.
Fact: CalPERS began putting away money for the baby boomers the day they first came to work for government. CalPERS plans are prefunded and contributions are received in every year that members accrue their benefits. The retirement of baby boomers has already been reflected in the rates using actuarial assumptions. The money needed to pay benefits for retirees is expected to be there when workers retire. CalPERS is expected to be able to keep up with baby boomers retirements and the expected increase in benefit payments.
Myth: CalPERS is in jeopardy because its funded status is dropping as a result of the market downturn.
Fact: Funded status is an important long-term indicator, and it will ebb and flow along with the conditions in the financial markets. The average funded ratio of CalPERS plans stood at over 100 percent on a market value basis at the height of the stock market boom, through fiscal year 2000-01. About 20 percent of that surplus was spent on benefit changes, which left 80 percent of the surplus to reduce future employer contributions. Then came one of the deepest and longest declines in stock market history. CalPERS experienced two fiscal years in a row of negative returns, which dropped the funded ratio to 80 percent. Then the markets rebounded to 103 percent as of June 30, 2007. The 2008-09 fiscal year again lowered the market value of assets, and the funded status is expected to be lower when we complete our accounting for the fiscal year. All plans are similarly situated, and this may be the “new normal” until markets turn around in the years ahead. For example, a funded status of 66 percent means if everyone were to retire today, CalPERS would have 66 percent of what is needed. However, CalPERS is made up of workers who will work full careers and retire 20 to 30 years from now. It is not necessary to keep the system 100 percent funded at all times. It is wise, however, to identify where the System is on this scale and monitor the funded status to ensure continued soundness of the system.
Myth: Increased pension formulas are bankrupting State and local government.
Fact: The downturn in the markets is the cause of greater employer contributions. Even if changes to pension formulas did not exist, CalPERS would need more contributions from employers, due to market losses over the past year. Only a quarter of the cost of State pensions is due to benefit changes of 1999.
Fact: Employer contribution rates have been very stable over the past six years, changing by less than 1 percent of payroll during the past six years, thanks to our rate-smoothing policy. The expected increase in employer rates due to the downturn will increase employer contributions by an average of 1 to 3.7 percent of payroll in 2011-12. View more information on projected increases in employer contribution rates for public agencies.
Myth: CalPERS pensioners can "goose" their retirement benefit upward by manipulating the income that gets included in their final year of compensation.
Fact: In 2003, SB 53 was adopted into law which greatly restricts the type of compensation allowable, and it reduces potential for enhancing final compensation in order to increase pensions. CalPERS has authority to investigate and prosecute pension fraud. Our internal investigative systems help protect against “pension spiking.”
Myth: The average CalPERS pensioner gets 80 percent of their pay.
Fact: The average CalPERS member receives 50 percent or less of their pay in retirement.
Myth: Police and firefighters retire at age 50 with 90 percent of pay.
Fact: CalPERS records indicate that over the last seven years, safety workers who retired at age 50 with 30 years of service represented 1 percent of all those retired. The reason very few ever would receive this level pension is that they would have had to start working age 20 to earn 30 years. Most start their safety careers at age 27, 28, or 29.
Twelve percent of all public safety members are subject to the 3 percent at age 55 formula. They would need 37.5 years of service at age 50 to get 90 percent, and would have had to start working at age 12.5 to earn 37.5 years. And 7 percent of all public agency safety members are subject to the 2 percent at age 50 formula. They would need to have 45 years of service at age 50 to get 90 percent, and would have had to start working at age 5 to earn 45 years.
Myth: The State of California and taxpayers pay the total cost of public pensions.
Fact: All government workers contribute to their CalPERS pensions. For state employees, the range is five to eight percent of their monthly earnings; for public agencies it is five to nine percent. While the vast majority pay five percent, firefighters, peace officers, and the CHP pay eight percent.
Myth: Pension Costs for the State of California have increased by 2000 percent in the last 10 years.
Fact: This statement compares a time when the State paid little or nothing during years of robust investment earnings and took a pension holiday to the recent market cycle extremes and current economic downturn.
Fact: In 1981-82, pension contributions for the largest category of employees cost the State 19.6 percent of payroll. For the current 2009-10 fiscal year the state is paying 16.9 percent.
Fact: The State of California pays less as a percentage of payroll today than it did in the early 1980s.
| 1981/82 | 2009/10 | |
| State Miscellaneous | 19.563% |
16.917% |
| State Safety | 20.409% | 18.099% |
| CHP |
31.995% | 28.438% |
| School Miscellaneous | 13.020% | 9.428% |
Myths & Facts about Teacher Pensions (courtesy of CTA)
Myth: The retirement fund is a taxpayer giveaway.
Fact: Over the life of their careers, teachers contribute 8% of their monthly pay to their retirement. Employers kick in another 8.25% of monthly pay, the state contributes just over 2% (which previously was 4.6% but was reduced a decade ago), and the returns garnered by CalSTRS investments do the rest.
Myth: Teachers engage in pension 'spiking'
Fact: CalSTRS is vigilant in preventing spiking. All extra compensation for teachers over and above their normal salary gets put into a separate account that cannot be used towards their final retirement salary.
Myth: Teachers retire too early and into a life of luxury.
Fact: The average benefit payment is $3,300 per month while the number of years a teacher works for those benefits averages 27.
Myth: The CalSTRS system is headed toward insolvency.
Fact: While it is true that CalSTRS has a $40 billion shortfall, this is not an amount that is paid overnight. Just like a mortgage, this is an amount that will need to be closed over 30 years, not in the first month’s payment. Even under current economic conditions, CalSTRS has sufficient assets and projected contributions to pay benefits until 2044.
Myth: CalSTRS suffers from a lack of accountability and oversight.
Fact: CalSTRS has received national recognition for its ethical standards. The system has a long history of accountability and transparency. In fact, the ethical standards of CalSTRS has become a national model for board accountability.
Myth: Our state would be better off financially without having to contribute to teachers’ retirement benefits.
Fact: The state benefits economically from teachers’ retirement benefits. In fact, $4.5 billion in value is added to the state’s economy each year from generated business activity from retirement benefits. Entire counties depend on that retirement income.
Video Links
"Stop the Lies," produced by AFSCME, details the concerted effort by politicians and special interest groups to attack public employees.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyCHV3DSQZE
In this video, you’ll learn about “CalPERS Responds,” a new website dedicated to debunking pension myths.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpVscRJ_Fec